- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:32:47 -0400
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Also, we discussed format=context to describe the format of an @context document. Gregg On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > Framed is definitely an issue, since passing a URI as a mime-type parameter would be a non-starter; probably not sufficient to set format=framed without some other out-of-band communication of the frame. Note that application/json+ld;format=framed is reasonable as a Content-Type. > > Also, I'd like to keep the straight application/ld+json for an un-specified serialization. My library tries to be intelligent about creating @context/@coerce entries and use of chaining along the lines of other serializers I've written. This may not be specified, but it should be allowed. > > Gregg > > On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> An IANA Considerations section has been added to the specification >> (Appendix D): >> >> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/ >> >> Input from the mailing list was considered, as was a bit of discussion >> with the WHATWG folks: >> >> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20110818#l-963 >> >> I also talked w/ Shane McCarron, who was involved in many of the XHTML >> specs, who pointed me to how the "+xml" pattern started for IANA >> registration: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt >> >> I also looked at the list of application/* IANA types, which has some >> prior art for a "+json" pattern: >> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/index.html >> >> All of that resulted in a MIME media type for JSON-LD of: >> >> application/ld+json >> >> I don't necessarily like it - but it is consistent with the state of the >> art in MIME media type registration. You can specifically request things >> like Compacted form by doing the following in the HTTP request header: >> >> Content-Type: application/ld+json;format=compacted >> >> As an added bonus, this "format" mechanism is going to make writing the >> test suite a bit easier as it will be able to switch on the "format" >> parameter in the Content-Type field. >> >> So, the IANA Considerations are nailed down pretty well at this point. >> If you don't agree with the direction, please say why and make sure to >> reference specs, consistent usage or prior-art as a basis for your >> arguments. >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) >> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released >> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/ >> > >
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 22:33:26 UTC