W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2011

RE: Requirements update

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:52:58 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <046101cc56d6$52c787e0$f85697a0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
I didn’t have much time to think about this yet, but here are two things I
noticed so far:

> 4. There MUST be a way label a JSON object with an IRI.

Should be: There MUST be a way *to* label ...


> 15. Without explicit syntactic support, JSON arrays MUST NOT
>     be interpreted as defining an object ordering.
> 16. A JSON-LD document SHOULD be able to express and ordered
> list objects.

Why are we inconsistent with the JSON spec in this regard? RFC4627
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627) is quite clear about this:

   An object is an unordered collection of zero or more name/value
   pairs, where a name is a string and a value is a string, number,
   boolean, null, object, or array.

   An array is an ordered sequence of zero or more values.


Will think a bit more about the rest of it tomorrow.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 20:53:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT