W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2011

Re: dropped Basic spec?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:05:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4E40338E.2030902@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 8/8/11 1:19 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> Regarding complexity, we need to consider the audience. I think that 
> JSON-LD implementations will pretty much need to implement most of the 
> spec (although normalization, expansion, and framing could be 
> considered to be optional bits by an implementation, IMO). I think the 
> basic spec was really targeted at publishers, to give them an easy way 
> into it. 

Yes.

> Other than algorithmic descriptions, the main things in the advanced 
> spec, not in the basic spec was chaining, multi-valued properties and 
> typed-literals. If people think this necessary, we could move these to 
> "Advanced Concepts", or include more in the introduction about basic use.

Yes, re. exploitation of "Advanced Concepts" partitioning to remove 
dangerous front-door distractions :-)


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen








Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 19:06:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT