- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:07:33 -0400
- To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 8/3/11 12:08 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >>> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>> We currently use: application/x-json+ld . >>> What was the rationale behind this? Why didn't you use >>> application/x-ld+json? >> >> Cos I had to make the decision in nano seconds, literally. We can change >> it once there is clear consensus :-) > > +1 from me for application/ld+json to signify +json compatibility. > > and +1 for application/x-ld+json in the interim until there is a proper > mime type registered, which is good practise / following the rules. +1 Gregg
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 17:08:31 UTC