W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2011

Re: "LD", consensus achieved.

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:48:38 -0400
Message-ID: <4E396DD6.50307@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 8/3/11 8:44 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> On 7/28/11 9:47 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>> Me too re:
>>>>
>>>> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or;
>>>> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD*
>>>> re. de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases.
>> Yes!
> +1 for both but it's not really clear for me which of the two options was chosen!? I would prefer 2.

+1 re. SHOULD or MAY.

I hear we've now gone for MAY?

Kingsley
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 15:49:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:35 GMT