- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:23:19 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: public-linked-json@w3.org
Markus Lanthaler wrote: > 7) application/ld+json The above looks good, nice and short, uses the +json appropriately, and doesn't repeat the term "json". > Would be using "text" instead of "application" an option? E.g. > text/json-ld+json text tree types would require the use of a ;charset=utf-8 suffix, and there may be some nuances around the +json and charsets, could be investigated. > I would also propose to define a media type parameter such as "context" to > be able to directly link to a context document in a HTTP header and thus > eliminating the need of @context in the JSON document itself. Unsure if ;context= would be a good idea, perhaps, maybe some overlap with ;profile= from json-schema, and may be able to leverage a Link header instead for this purpose. I guess it depends whether we think context is, and always will be, ld+json specific. Best, Nathan
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 13:24:15 UTC