- From: A. Soroka <ajs6f@virginia.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:56:51 -0400
- To: LDP Next <public-ldpnext@w3.org>
Of possible interest... --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> > Subject: Adding LDN Inbox to the LDP namespace > Date: September 27, 2016 at 11:20:29 AM EDT > To: public-vocabs@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org, public-rww@w3.org, public-ldp@w3.org, public-ldp-wg@w3.org > Resent-From: semantic-web@w3.org > > Hi all, > > LDN [1] is a linked data friendly notifications spec, on the recommendation track in the Social Web WG. We use the `inbox` predicate to indicate for any resource where notifications should be sent to. As we already use `ldp:contains`, we're planning to add `inbox` to the LDP namespace. > > This was discussed at a breakout session at TPAC [2] and on Github [3]. If you have any questions, concerns, or further comments (for example, if you think adding this predicate will affect your existing implementation or break something), please raise them in this email thread or on github. > > This potentially sets a precedent, but for now is a one-time thing. The W3C can perhaps use it as a case study on which to base future discussions of a general policy around namespace additions. > > Thanks! > > -Sarven and Amy > http://csarven.ca/#i > http://rhiaro.co.uk/#me > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ > [2] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/21-vocabs-minutes.html > [3] https://github.com/csarven/ldn/issues/13 >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:57:20 UTC