Has anything happened about registering the "include" and "omit"
preferences for the "return=representation" preference with IANA?
I can't see anything in RFC 7240 (HTTP Prefer) that talks about
registering additional optional parameters on an existing preference.
However, merely defining them and not having the registry updated seems to
go against the spirit of having a registry.
I am asking as a discussion elsewhere has resulted in the suggestion of
using a new parameter in a similar way, and I want to benefit from LDP's
discussion of the parameters defined here (and I can't find them in the
mailing list archives).
Many thanks,
Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel
E-mail: martinpain@uk.ibm.com
Find me on: and within IBM on:
IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number
741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU