(no subject)

On 26 Mar 2013, at 12:44, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 3/26/13 5:15 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:06, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 02:35, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>>>> Something like "text/turtle;profile=http://ldp.net/ldpr" would be really
>>>> cool as it could be applied to any (past or future) RDF format and
>>>> mostly ignored by clients/servers that don't understand it.
>>> That would be ok with me.
>> I have argued before this is the wrong place to put that information, and
>> that it has nothing to do with the mime type.
>> 
>> Henry
> 
> Yes you have [1]. Thus, it's profiles or media type. Which is the least costly to folks on the RDF side of things?
> 
> Links:
> 
> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Feb/0069.html -- earlier thread.

Thanks for finding the link to my post. 

My argument there is that this is not a media type issue. If you want to specify in the 
Header that the resource is an LDPC you can use the Link relation type. Doing it at the
media-type level is a misunderstanding of the role of media types. My post went into 
detail on why this is so.

> 
> 
> Kinglsey
>> 
>>> Richard
>>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/