W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:44:41 -0400
Message-ID: <51518A29.2090103@openlinksw.com>
To: public-ldp@w3.org
On 3/26/13 5:15 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:06, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
>
>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 02:35, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>>> Something like "text/turtle;profile=http://ldp.net/ldpr" would be really
>>> cool as it could be applied to any (past or future) RDF format and
>>> mostly ignored by clients/servers that don't understand it.
>> That would be ok with me.
> I have argued before this is the wrong place to put that information, and
> that it has nothing to do with the mime type.
>
> Henry

Yes you have [1]. Thus, it's profiles or media type. Which is the least 
costly to folks on the RDF side of things?

Links:

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Feb/0069.html 
-- earlier thread.


Kinglsey
>
>> Richard
>>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 11:45:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:10 UTC