W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:33:16 -0700
Message-ID: <514C79BC.4000405@berkeley.edu>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
hello all.

On 2013-03-22 6:52 , Henry Story wrote:
> There is still a question whether binaries (images, etc) are non-LDPRs
> or if they too are LDPRs.

i have a terminology request: can we maybe stop talking about "binary 
resources" and simply call those things non-LDP resources? they are 
simply all resources outside of the LDP media type (i.e., they are 
anything where we don't define the interaction rules), so they can be 
images, but they can also be plain text, XML, or even non-LDP RDF. 
whatever our protocol allows us to link in as LDP content will become 
such a non-LDP resource, identified by a LDP link.

cheers,

dret.
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 15:34:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:10 UTC