W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2013

Re: A modest attempt to re-open ISSUE-20

From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:52:11 -0400
Message-ID: <1363279931.2103.63.camel@james-PBL21>
To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 09:43 -0700, Erik Wilde wrote:
> hello martynas.
> 
> On 2013-03-14 9:28 , Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
> > b) the resource describing person does not exist.
> > You mint new URIs of the resource and the person and PUT the RDF into
> > resource's URI.
> > What's wrong with that? A client could that automatically.
> 
> it's not the client's thing to decide on URIs for new resources, at 
> least in the usual case. servers manage the URI namespace and assign 
> URIs for new resources. clients may suggest URIs (well, mostly certain 
> path components of them) using HTTP Slug, but they cannot depend on the 
> server actually using these components.
> 

Sure, but there is nothing wrong with the client suggesting the URI to
use in the posted RDF model itself. The server is under no obligation to
accept the RDF as-is.

James
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 16:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:10 UTC