W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2013

Re: A modest attempt to re-open ISSUE-20

From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:52:11 -0400
Message-ID: <1363279931.2103.63.camel@james-PBL21>
To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 09:43 -0700, Erik Wilde wrote:
> hello martynas.
> On 2013-03-14 9:28 , Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
> > b) the resource describing person does not exist.
> > You mint new URIs of the resource and the person and PUT the RDF into
> > resource's URI.
> > What's wrong with that? A client could that automatically.
> it's not the client's thing to decide on URIs for new resources, at 
> least in the usual case. servers manage the URI namespace and assign 
> URIs for new resources. clients may suggest URIs (well, mostly certain 
> path components of them) using HTTP Slug, but they cannot depend on the 
> server actually using these components.

Sure, but there is nothing wrong with the client suggesting the URI to
use in the posted RDF model itself. The server is under no obligation to
accept the RDF as-is.

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 16:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:10 UTC