W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [unhosted] Internet-Draft-Draft

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:18:56 -0500
Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
Message-Id: <2751BB4D-6908-4C2B-9B2F-64DD9FF47F05@3roundstones.com>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Do you know if the authors are aware of the LDP WG?

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Nov 27, 2012, at 08:49, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

> FYI: an IETF style spec underway for client side apps talking to data servers ... perhaps there is some overlap with LDP
> 
> https://michielbdejong.com/spec.txt
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <michiel@michielbdejong.com>
> Date: 26 November 2012 12:04
> Subject: [unhosted] Internet-Draft-Draft
> To: unhosted@googlegroups.com
> 
> 
> Hi! here is a draft of our Internet Draft: https://michielbdejong.com/spec.txt. The changes compared to 2012.04 are:
> * storage-first is mentioned as a "MAY" at the end for servers, but a "SHOULD" for apps (remoteStorage.js would handle this).
> * the storage_api parameter is updated to the name of the I-D.
> * the root scopes are renamed from ":r" and ":rw" to the more understandable "root:r" and "root:rw".
> * the "Last-Modified" header is renamed to the more correct "ETag". Since these are all textual changes and not functional ones, there is no need for any existing storage servers to update any of these things, but as i already discussed with Niklas, remoteStorage.js would start supporting both 2012.04 and this version.
> Comments very welcome!
> Cheers,
> Michiel.
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 




Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 14:19:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 November 2012 14:19:31 GMT