W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2012

Re: major revision of LDP draft charter

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:53:06 -0400
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>, W3CSW CG Group <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1332096786.6552.2.camel@waldron>
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 13:18 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2012, at 13:10, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > * Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> [2012-03-18 12:46-0400]
> >> 
> >> Quick iphone reply for now. Basically "what's the hurry?". The whole thing seems to be based on a magazine article that is rumoured to be a potential Submission to W3C. How did we jump from that to a proposed group already?
> >> 
> >> Apologies if I've missed more context,
> > 
> > The bulk of the context is the LEDP workshop
> >  <http://www.w3.org/2011/09/LinkedData/>
> > at which the ~45 participants said they wanted a WG and some wanted to
> > help with the Submission which IBM was working on. We promised to
> > create a mailing list <mailto:public-ldp@w3.org> where we would float
> > a proposed charter.
> > 
> > The next natural step is to float that charter by the AC once we have
> > a guage for how well it meets the community's needs.
> 
> Thanks! In that case role of the workshop, and details on consensus amongst its attendees, should be higher visibility in abstract/intro. Otherwise the motivation feels a bit weak.
> 
> 'This Group addresses a need identified by ... who agreed ... and asked W3C to ..."? Etc

Thanks for pointing this out.   The "advance notice" mentioned in the
first line of the alert box explains all this, but of course that's not
public and not part of the charter.   I've rewritten the first paragraph
of the intro to make this more clear.

     -- Sandro

> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> >> Dan
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 18 Mar 2012, at 12:13, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> After various discussions, we've rewritten the Linked Data Platform
> >>> (LDP) draft charter.  New version is here:
> >>> 
> >>>       http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter
> >>> 
> >>> The diff is linked from there, but only the last few paragraphs
> >>> (standard charter stuff) are the similar enough for the diff to be
> >>> useful.
> >>> 
> >>> At this point, we're expecting to formally propose this to the W3C
> >>> membership within a week or two, so please review it soon.
> >>> 
> >>>  -- Sandro
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -ericP
> 
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2012 18:53:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 18 March 2012 18:53:18 GMT