Re: Getting to closure on the remaining issues

On 24 Jan 2014, at 16:27, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:

> On 01/24/2014 10:07 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> 
>> On 24 Jan 2014, at 15:55, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 01/24/2014 09:15 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>> On 1/24/14 3:11 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>>>>> Somewhere inhttp://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.html, at the fragment-id
>>>>>>> #Container, I expect to find something saying that ldp:Container when
>>>>>>> used with rel=profile denotes the Container interaction model as
>>>>>>> defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id.
>>>>> You can not do things like that in RDF. You can not have a URI
>>>>> denote one thing if it is related to by one relation, and another thing
>>>>> if it is related to by another relation.
>>>>> 
>>>> Alexandre,
>>>> 
>>>> Wouldn't you be better served by providing an example of what you mean?
>>>> Like Henry, I don't understand what you mean i.e., how you would express
>>>> what you claim using RDF.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container> a rdf:Class ;
>>>  dc:description "when use with with rel=profile, denotes the Container interaction model as defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id" .
>> 
>> This suggests that with another relation ldp:Container denotes something else. Yet a URI always only
>> denotes one thing. That is core to the notion of a URI, and clearly written out in the ldp semantics.
> 
> I still don't understand. Can you say where it's "clearly written out"?
> 
> In plain English: ldp:Container happens to be a class that can be used
> to denote the Container interaction model when used with
> rel=profile. What's wrong in that sentence?

What does it denote when it is not used with rel=profile?

Henry

> 
> Alexandre.
> 
>> 
>> Henry
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Alexandre.
>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 15:30:28 UTC