Re: database experts reviewing paging; was Re: snapshots, was Re: Stable locking

Hi Ashok,

Yes. We were also not thinking that this would fall under the scope of LDP
1.0. We were thinking that it might be useful in LDP++ or even as an
external extension to LDP. It would be interesting to have a discussion on
this and as you said I will prepare the material for the
discussion. Definitely It would be nice to have a workshop to discuss the
issues such as access control and transactions.

Best Regards,
Nandana


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote:

>  Hi Nandana:
> This goes a bit beyond our current concerns in LDP but if you want to
> discuss
> make some foils.  I'm planning on making some foils based on our paging
> discussions
> so we can discuss together.
> After our last f2f David Wood and I spoke with W3C Management about
> discussing
> database concerns like access control and transactions and we were told
> there would
> be a workshop but I have not heard anything since.
> Thanks!
> Ashok
>
>
> On 4/7/2014 7:13 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
>
> Hi Ashok,
>
>  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:18 AM, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's a very different world.
>> We don't have locks, we don't have transactions.
>>
>
>  We had a similar requirements regarding on transactions and isolation
> (not specially on paging) in one of the proof-of-concept that we are
> building. We have been reviewing literature on how to do transactions in
> REST-compliant systems so that we can use similar approaches in LDP. There
> are bunch of models proposed for transactions over the years though they
> have their own set of problems. We just finished presenting some of our
> initial findings in the WS-REST workshop at WWW.
>
>  http://ws-rest.org/2014/sites/default/files/wsrest2014_submission_4.pdf
>
>  Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
>
>