Re: claimed completion of ACTION-97 - proposal for pure-HTTP paging

> > Container sort criteria are far less obvious however, and was the 
sticky 
> > part when we discussed the proposal at the F2F.  Those currently 
require 
> > the presence of a ldp:Page resource in the triples regardless of 
whether 
> > or not the particular resource supports paging.
> 
> Aren't they only in LDPCs? I'm just trying to get the LDP footprint
> out of the LDPRs (per TimBL's request, but it also makes sense to me).

Sort criteria only exist on LDPCs, yes.
LDPCs are also LDPRs.

So is it your contention then that, by omission, the representation of an 
LDPC where the server wishes to expose the sort criteria it used includes 
a ldp:Page (describing the sort criteria)?  Thus, if a sorted LDPC is also 
paged, the GET response message conveying said representation ALSO has (in 
paging headers)
    Link: http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp/Resource; rel=type
    Link: <resourceURL>?page2; rel=next
    Link: <resourceURL>; rel=collection



Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario