Re: the state of ldp-patch, and a procedural proposal

On 4 Oct 2013, at 00:48, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 10/3/13 6:13 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> 
>> Because "resource" is the problem. It will soon be yanked out of all literature for which it serves to simple confuse rather than enlighten. I believe that effort is actually in progress. 
> Meant to say:
> 
> Because "resource" is the problem. It will soon be yanked out of all literature for which it serves to *simply* confuse rather than enlighten. I believe that effort is actually in progress.

Sorry but what does all this conversation have to do with PATCH, which is an issue I am interested in,
and that I'd like debated seriously?

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 23:03:58 UTC