Fwd: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP?

Forwarding  note from Melvin Carvalho

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP?
Date: 	Thu, 9 May 2013 19:33:28 +0200
From: 	Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
To: 	ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>






On 9 May 2013 15:43, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Do we need transaction support in LDP?  One of the big features of LDP wrt to the
    rest of the Web is that it is read/write.  If clients can update information then we need
    to say something about transaction support.   This could be along the lines of the note
    on Access Control.

    BTW, I have not seen any comments on my latest suggestion re. Access Control.
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/0109.html
    Please take a look and comment.


Additionally you may be interested in this spec at the IETF which covers remote data stores, containers, access control and versioning

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dejong-remotestorage-00.txt

    -- 
    All the best, Ashok

Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 18:50:04 UTC