Hi, On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Pierre-Antoine Champin < pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr> wrote: > Hi Henry, > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote: > >> A POST of a graph that contains the triple >> >> <> a ldp:Container . >> >> SHOULD/MUST create an ldp:Container >> > > yes > > >> >> Question: >> >> 1. Does a PUT of a graph that contains that triple create an >> ldp:Container ? >> >> 2. Does a PATCH that adds that triple turn that resource into an >> ldp:Container ? >> >> 3. Does a PATCH that removes that triple make that ldp:Container into a >> simple LDPR ? >> >> 4. if a POST were to append the posted graph to an LDPR would posting >> that triple turn >> that LDPR into an LDPC? > > > Note that I'm not saying that the spec must forbid this, I'm only saying > it should not mandate it. > I also think we should not mandate 1,2, and 3. I am trying to think of any practical use-case where you have to convert a container into a resource and vice versa. May be it is easier to think about a use-case where you want to convert a LDPR into a LDPC but I couldn't think of a good one yet. Henry, do you have one in your mind ? Best Regards, Nandana
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 10:41:12 UTC