W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Discovery/Affordances (Issue-32/Issue-57)

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:41:21 -0400
Message-ID: <51B9E821.6080100@w3.org>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 06/13/2013 11:31 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
[snip]
> * Important Note: As I indicated before the spec doesn't currently
> require LDPRs to be typed with something like ldp:Resource.

I don't see how this would be possible anyway, because an LDPR does not 
have to be an RDF graph.

Alexandre.


> So I think
> you're missing something if you only want to rely on the RDF content.
> You wouldn't be able to tell that you're looking at an LDPR.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>
> Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 06/13/2013 07:35:40 AM:
>
>  > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
>  > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS,
>  > Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
>  > Date: 06/13/2013 07:46 AM
>  > Subject: Re: Discovery/Affordances (Issue-32/Issue-57)
>  >
>  > On 13 Jun 2013, at 16:20, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 06/11/2013 11:36:04 PM:
>  > >
>  > > Ok, so I have spent a day trying to understand what it is that Erik
>  > > Wilde is proposing, and I can
>  > > get nowhere with it. So please can he propose something that is
>  > > coherent and clearly written out
>  > > so that we can have some ability to understand what he wants?
>  > >
>  > > Henry
>  >
>  > Hi Henry,
>  >
>  > Are you referring to the proposal to use a profile? I'm the one
>  > who's made the proposal and I explained both why I made it and what
> it is.
>  > Let's hope we can use next week's F2F to more effictively
>  > communicate and come to an understanding if not an agreement.
>  >
>  > Ah ok.
>  >
>  > Can you show us the full Link header that you would propose be
>  > used by the Server to show what it is you think needs saying.
>  > This Link header will contain a relation and a value.
>  > What is the value, and what is the relation meant to mean?
>  >
>  > Then it will be easier to see if one can agree to that, and what
>  > the consequences of this is meant to be.
>  >
>  > Henry
>  >
>  > --
>  > Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>  >
>  > Social Web Architect
>  > http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 15:41:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:51 UTC