- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:57:36 -0400
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7JrKm=aZzBXnfg6iQLFOuu8PEEDj+vQU_f2k8V702q+oFw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin < pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > here is my review of the editor's draft. > > Unfortunately, I won't be on the call next monday to discuss it, but I'll > try to check my mail if you have any comment/question. > > pa > > > ... snip ... > Sec 4.2 LDPR - HTTP GET > > * 4.2.3 : MUST was supposed to be replaced by SHOULD according to the > resolution of https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/53 > > > Made this change (note the section is 4.2.2) as it affects a normative statement. Good catch, thanks ISSUE-53 4.2.2 changed MUST to SHOULD - Steve Speicher ... snip .. > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>wrote: > >> In today's teleconference we agreed that we declared the latest working >> draft [1] as ready for immediate review. The idea is to gather enough >> feedback by next Monday (July 22nd) to make a decision on going to Last >> Call. We also have published a vocabulary document [2] and HTML diff (from >> March 7th 2nd PWD) [3]. >> >> The editors are still tweaking a few things but most items have been >> completed. The sooner that feedback is given the better, if the editors >> receive a large number of comments late...we may not be able to process in >> a timely way. >> >> [1] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html >> [2] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.ttl >> [3] - >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-diff-20130715.html >> >> - Steve Speicher >> > >
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 12:58:06 UTC