- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:12:49 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50FDAF51.7090804@openlinksw.com>
On 1/21/13 4:05 PM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > > On 1/21/2013 11:01 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> Is this something you want for all resources mentioned in all LDPRs, >> or is it that you are thinking >> of LDPAs as very special things? Ie: do you think that any resource >> that appears in an LDPR/A SHOULD >> be removed from that LDPR/A before being deleted? > > Members of a collection are deleted when the collection is deleted, > so, that's not a problem. > It's the LDPA case I am concerned about. > > I think LDP is different from the Web. It is a data model and demands > consistency. > But, regardless, the SHOULD covers both bases. It recommends > consistency but allows > you to be inconsistent if you wish. > > Ashok > > > Ashok, LDP stands for Linked Data Platform. The "Linked Data" component is all about Web-scale Structured Data and the RDF Model. I don't agree with your characterization. This effort is about the Web. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 21:13:12 UTC