Re: issue-34 example

> 
>>> that seems like something that's completely out of scope of the LDP
>>> protocol. yes, there may be constraints on payload, but defining and
>>> enforcing those should now be something LDP is concerned with.
>> typo?  was now or not the intent?
>> It's a "somewhat plausible" read either way, although my instinct is that
>> 'not' was the intent [LDP is/should not be concerned with validation]Best
>> Regards, John
> 
> indeed, a very bad typo.
> 
> "there may be constraints on payload, but defining and enforcing those
> should not be something LDP is concerned with."
> 

I'm curious. I believe that LDP should be used by people developing Bug Tracker APIs, Cloud Management APIs, Photo Management APIs, etc, etc, etc - (using the widespread interpretation of the word "API") ... I think these kind of scenarios are important. But, does anyone else see it that way, or am I in the wrong group :) ?

Roger

> thanks for catching this! cheers,
> 
> dret.
> 
>