W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: interaction with a bug-tracker LDP service

From: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:25:42 +0000
CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <074CA916-E503-4F36-B7A0-EDA616ABB3E7@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>

On 2 Jan 2013, at 16:04, Steve Battle wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roger Menday [mailto:Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com]
>> Say then, I want to link <Tracker/1/Bug/3> to another (existing)
> resource.
>> The <Tracker/1/Bug/3;related> collection represents all the :related
> links.
>> I can discover that it requires a ldp:link property to seed the process.
>> POST to <Tracker/1/Bug/3;related> with "<> ldp:link <Tracker/1/Bug/1> ."
> I'm not clear why you're using POST to create a link to an _existing_
> resource.
> My understanding is that POST is a mechanism to create _new_ resources
> within containers.
> Could the example use PUT or PATCH instead?

This proposal is a way to manage a resource through it's set of links. I have some other material that shows how this can be used to do directed "fine-grained" updates - i.e. then PATCH isn't needed. 


> Steve.

Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:26:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:44 UTC