Re: Re-Spec references for LDP WG documents

I don't see a problem with contributing (pull request) to include these
references.  They look right to me.

- Steve Speicher


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> To have more flexibility the RDF WG has its own local copy of ReSpec,
> including the biblio. Of course this has its own downside in that updates
> and improvements to ReSpec don't come for free - someone needs to refresh
> the local copy every now and then, but I have found it convenient to use.
>
> This may be something we should consider doing for the LDP WG.
>
> Best regards.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>
>
>
> From:        Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
> To:        "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>,
> Date:        08/27/2013 10:28 PM
> Subject:        Re-Spec references for LDP WG documents
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> At the moment we have three references in biblio.json [1] with
> keys LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM, ldp, and ldp-ucr. Shall we
>
> 1. Unify LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM and ldp into one (using one as an alias)
> 2. Add references to the best practices guide, primer, and test cases
> document
>
> More concretely, following changes
> *
> https://github.com/nandana/specref/commit/aad378fc37fb932985c6bb08b501b4dedd897c3a
> *<https://github.com/nandana/specref/commit/aad378fc37fb932985c6bb08b501b4dedd897c3a>
>
> If that is ok, I can make a pull request to update biblio.json.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
> [1] - *https://raw.github.com/tobie/specref/master/biblio.json*<https://raw.github.com/tobie/specref/master/biblio.json>
>
>
>