Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-35: POSTing to a container MUST yield a fresh URI

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 17/04/13 16:53, David Wood wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:21, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com
>> <mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> At the face to face meeting we discussed this issue but were unable to
>>> come to a resolution. We decided to give everybody more time to think
>>> about it.
>>> I would like to propose that we resolve issue-35 by adding that
>>> servers SHOULD not reuse URLs while acknowledging that they MAY under
>>> certain circumstances.
>>>
>>> This is consistent with the resolution of ISSUE-24: Should DELETED
>>> resources remain deleted? [2]:
>>>
>>> Close ISSUE-24 with the following: Delete the phrase in 4.5.1 that
>>> says "Until ... Request URI"; add a sentence, "Clients should note
>>> that severs may reuse a Request-URI under some circumstances."
>>>
>>
>> +1.
>
>
> +1
>

+1

--
- Steve

>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> --
>> http://about.me/david_wood
>>
>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-03-15#ISSUE__2d_35__3a__POSTing_to_a_container_MUST_yield_a_fresh_URI
>>>
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-01#resolution_4
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> --
>>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 18:47:29 UTC