Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-35: POSTing to a container MUST yield a fresh URI

On 17/04/13 16:53, David Wood wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:21, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com
> <mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> At the face to face meeting we discussed this issue but were unable to
>> come to a resolution. We decided to give everybody more time to think
>> about it.
>> I would like to propose that we resolve issue-35 by adding that
>> servers SHOULD not reuse URLs while acknowledging that they MAY under
>> certain circumstances.
>>
>> This is consistent with the resolution of ISSUE-24: Should DELETED
>> resources remain deleted? [2]:
>>
>> Close ISSUE-24 with the following: Delete the phrase in 4.5.1 that
>> says "Until ... Request URI"; add a sentence, "Clients should note
>> that severs may reuse a Request-URI under some circumstances."
>>
>
> +1.

+1

>
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-03-15#ISSUE__2d_35__3a__POSTing_to_a_container_MUST_yield_a_fresh_URI
>>
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-01#resolution_4
>>
>> Regards.
>> --
>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 08:39:04 UTC