Re: Review and Comments for Linked Data Platform FPWD

David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote on 10/28/2012 09:09:35 PM:

> From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
>...
> 
> Would the WG accept a compromise?  I propose that clients MUST 
> inform servers if they expect null relative URIs to be placed with 
> the newly created URI for the resource.  That way, servers only need
> to incur the cost of the extra parsing and computation when they are
> told they need to do it.  Does that work?
> 
> The flag can be passed to the server on the PUT URL by appending ?
> updateNull or some such.
> 

As I told David verbally, this doesn't work because the PUT URL  has to be 
that of the resource to be created but it could be done using a header.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:25:09 UTC