Re: LDP F2F agenda

According to TPAC's calendar [1] there is a reception organized on
Wednesday evening:

"Wednesday Evening: Plenary Reception for AC, Chairs, group participants,
AB, TAG, Offices staff, Team "

and the TPAC schedule page [2] reads "18h30-21h30: Dinner "

I did plan for a WG dinner on Thursday evening though. If anyone has any
idea/suggestion that would be nice. Maybe someone (Olivier? Alexandre?) has
local knowledge and can help us plan for something?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/
[2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2012#Plenary_Day_Schedule
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM wrote on 10/18/2012 07:00:59 PM:

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS,
> Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> Date: 10/18/2012 07:01 PM
> Subject: Re: LDP F2F agenda
>
> Perhaps I could suggest a Day 0 topic: Wednesday evening WG dinner!
>
> A good addition?  Seems like a good way to end plenary day and kick
> off WG activities
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
http://open-services.net
>
> Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 10/18/2012 08:06:41 PM:
>
> > From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org,
> > Date: 10/18/2012 08:07 PM
> > Subject: LDP F2F agenda
> >
> > I've updated the F2F page [1] with objectives for the meeting and a
more
> > detailed agenda. I would very much appreciate feedback on these.
> >
> > I found it rather challenging to set a precise agenda at this point but
I
> > tried to take into account the following:
> >
> > - breaks and lunches are pretty much set by TPAC, although some slight
> > variation is possible
> > - the crux of the work is going to be to start digging into the list of

> > issues we now have and try to make progress on as many of them as
possible
> > - I'm not sure how many issues we can go through before exhaustion
starts
> > kicking in though
> > - to allow for remote participation from the US it would be nice to
keep
> > some of this stuff to be discussed later rather sooner during the day
> >
> > To try and minimize the exhaustion factor I tried to split heavy topics
into
> > several chunks of time that I mixed with other topics. I didn't goas
far as
> > trying to list which issue will be discussed when though. Allocating
> > specific amount of time to each issue seems too arbitrary at this point
and
> > I'm thinking we may be better off playing it by ear so that, for
instance,
> > if we are tired we can tackle an easier issue next.
> >
> > However, if you think differently please let me know. If those who will
be
> > participating remotely could let me know if there are topics or issues
they
> > especially care about and at what time it might be more convenientfor
them
> > to have them on the agenda I'll be happy to try and accommodate as
> much as possible.
> >
> > All comments and suggestions are welcome.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/F2F1
> > --
> > Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group