Re: First Public Working Draft

Well, public working drafts are arguably less important in the case of a 
public WG because anyone can access the editors drafts anyway but I think 
they are still valuable in communicating where we are more broadly and 
providing the WG with clearly identified milestones.
I can't say how much of a difference this would make for the WebID spec 
though.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
To:     Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
Cc:     public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Date:   10/10/2012 08:54 AM
Subject:        Re: First Public Working Draft




On 10 Oct 2012, at 17:22, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

Hi Henry, 

The October 22 deadline was simply driven by the goal of having our FPWD 
before the face to face meeting and try to stay in sync with the schedule 
set by our charter [1]. 
The plan is merely to publish the current draft, annotated with all the 
issues that have been raised to date. The editors said they can produce 
such a document by October 22 so this seems like an achievable goal. 

Do you have any concerns?

I was thinking that this was important to have specs in a certain state 
before
TPAC. As the WebID group also has a spec, I was thinking it may also need
to be as a Public Working Draft state. Perhaps that makes a difference 
somehow?


[1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter#deliverables 
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:        Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> 
To:        public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
Date:        10/10/2012 05:49 AM 
Subject:        First Public Working Draft 



The deadline for the First Public Working Draft is 22 October.
There was discussion on IRC and during the teleconf about that,
and it seemed like this was a very strict deadline. What was the
reason for that deadline?

Henry


Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/



Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/