W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: ldp-ISSUE-38 (filtering, inlining): filtered representations and inlining [Linked Data Platform core]

From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:00:03 +0000
CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E99A8FF3-9E02-45DF-ADA9-93FAB6D8449E@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
> 
>> we're building a service and as such, we cannot expose implementation details. we want to allow and encourage LDP implementation on non-RDF back-ends. so what we can expose is the service surface including the interactions it affords, but assuming that service internals are RDF would go too far.
> I agree, but I'm curious if we have general agreement on this point

Ashok,

I suspect that most agree on this point.
After-all, we (i.e. Fujitsu) have a lot more non-RDF backends than RDF backends .... :)

Roger

> Ashok
> 



Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 10:01:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:42 UTC