W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Can ISSUE-7 be closed?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:27:15 +0000
Message-ID: <509A2973.10708@epimorphics.com>
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org


On 06/11/12 17:11, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> This is fine with me. I'd like Andy to weigh in on this though since
> he's the one who opened issue-7.

Are the use cases addressed? ISSUE-30?

I think issues 33,34 are effectively creating a new concept, which is 
part of a LDPR, for link management for references.  There is a lot 
pushed into whatever the PATCH format actually is so until there is a 
proposal, it's hard to say much.

That a LDPC can't accept links (to things on another platform, not 
strong) added seems odd.

If you think there are sufficient issues to cover issue-7, then let's 
close it as duplication.

	Andy

> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>
> Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote on 11/06/2012 01:09:36 AM:
>
>  > From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
>  > To: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>,
>  > Date: 11/06/2012 01:10 AM
>  > Subject: Can ISSUE-7 be closed?
>  >
>  > Housekeeping.
>  >
>  >   ISSUE-7: What operations are permitted on containers and how do
>  > they get invoked
>  > https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/7
>  >
>  > I believe that this can be closed because the concern it addresses
>  > is partially answered by the following resolution:
>  >
>  >   Make the containers in the spec be about Strong Composition, then
> accept
>  >   proposals for how to do weak aggregation. And separate proposals for
>  >   paging, etc.
>  > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-02#resolution_1
>  >
>  > And I believe that any remaining unresolved concerns fit under the
>  > following new issues:
>  >
>  >   ISSUE-33: Pagination for non-container resources
>  > https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/33
>  >
>  >   ISSUE-34: Adding and removing arcs in weak aggregation
>  > https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/34
>  >
>  > Therefore:
>  >
>  >   PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-7; related concerns will be addressed under
>  > ISSUE-33 and ISSUE-34.
>  >
>  > If there are other remaining concerns related to ISSUE-7 that are
>  > not covered by 33 and 34 or other existing issues, then it would be
>  > good to get them captured more explicitly.
>  >
>  > Best,
>  > Richard
>  >
>  >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 09:27:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:26 UTC