W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > July 2012


From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 16:56:02 +0200
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1FA3A448.CD63D35C-ON88257A32.00511932-C1257A32.00520A43@us.ibm.com>
Looking at how the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol (GPS) and Basic Profile 
(BP) submission compare, the most obvious difference I see is the fact GPS 
primarily deals with "graphs" while BP deals with Basic Profile Resources 
and Containers.

So, I'd like to ask whether considering a BPR as a graph would, at least 
to some extend, provide some alignment between the two specs. I think two 
aspects need to be considered: 1) what URL is used, 2) what triples are 

Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:58:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:39 UTC