W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: LDP Agenda for December 17, 2012, with a list of issues to be closed

From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 23:52:32 +0000
Cc: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <F729769F-2415-413A-80AF-4CDF47AF7780@sysemia.co.uk>
To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>

On 15 Dec 2012, at 21:31, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:

> 
> On 12/15/2012 10:41 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> So, to clarify, the model applications can handle on their own is a basic aggregation model where the server isn't expected to do anything special - like deleting member resources when the container is deleted. As of Lyon, we agreed to define the composition model in LDP and left the aggregation model to be proposed by those who feel the need for it. We have yet to see a concrete proposal.
> 
> PROPOSAL: 
> Add an attribute to Container called DeleteMembers.  Boolean.  Default = YES


-0.5

I really don't like this. If this were false then why use a container in the first place. Just use aggregation and describe the collection in RDF. The LDP spec doesn't need to be concerned with what we can say in RDF.

Steve.
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2012 23:53:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:26 UTC