W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Open Issues against UC&R

From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:52:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOUJ7JpwMe8Y=54DBdjJWf_yrbY3Vi9L-6ZeWiniUhBbFW909w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Yes, we all assumed they were LDP Core and I included them back in the
FPWD as stated.  So we are well covered.

- Steve

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Steve Battle
<steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote:
> OK, I'll go ahead. Steve Speicher already verified that there's no impact on
> the LDP Core FPWD, as he spotted my error months back and included these
> issues anyway.
>
> Thanks, Steve.
>
>
> On 5 Dec 2012, at 17:42, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Please, go ahead. I consider this a clerical error and don't see the need to
> be overly procedural about fixing this.
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
>
> Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com> wrote on 12/04/2012 11:34:59
> AM:
>
>> From: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
>> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/
>> Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS,
>> Date: 12/04/2012 11:35 AM
>> Subject: Open Issues against UC&R
>> Sent by: Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com>
>>
>> We currently have seven open issues against the LDP UC&R <https://
>> www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/products/3>.
>> Four of these are really issues about the Linked Data Platform Core;
>> I know because I raised them.
>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/16>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/17>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/18>
>> <https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/21>
>>
>> These issues were provoked by analysis of the use-cases, hence my
>> mistake, but the subject is the LDP Core. Blame my unfamiliarity
>> with the tool and the unclear semantics of 'Product'.
>> I don't recall this (mis)assignment being in any way critical to
>> their acceptance as 'open' issues, so am I allowed procedurally to
>> change the product now?
>> We plan to annotate the UC&R FPWD with any open issues relevant to
>> it, as is the Linked Data Platform FPWD. So this product assignment
>> is important.
>>
>> If anyone has any technical or procedural objections please let me
>> know. I'll hold off from making any such change until after the call
>> next Monday.
>>
>> Note that the other three issues are properly issues against UC&R,
>> and will be considered as such.
>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/30>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40>
>> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/41>
>>
>> Thanks, Steve.
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve Battle
>>
>> --
>> Steve Battle
>> Semantic Engineer
>>
>> E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
>> Web: www.sysemia.com
>>
>> Sysemia Limited
>> The Innovation Centre, Bristol&  Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent,
>> Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR
>> Registered in England and Wales. Company Number: 7555456
>>
>> DISCLAIMER
>>
>> Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
>> addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If
>> you receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If
>> you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of
>> distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
>> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>> Attachments to this e-mail may contain software viruses which may
>> damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken reasonable steps to
>> minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments are virus
>> checked before they are opened.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



--
- Steve
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:26 UTC