W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Open Issues against UC&R

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:42:44 -0800
To: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF88E319C8.AEA562A3-ON88257ACB.0061360E-88257ACB.00614CCE@us.ibm.com>
Please, go ahead. I consider this a clerical error and don't see the need 
to be overly procedural about fixing this.
Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com> wrote on 12/04/2012 11:34:59 
AM:

> From: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/
> Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
> Date: 12/04/2012 11:35 AM
> Subject: Open Issues against UC&R
> Sent by: Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com>
> 
> We currently have seven open issues against the LDP UC&R <https://
> www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/products/3>.
> Four of these are really issues about the Linked Data Platform Core;
> I know because I raised them.
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/16>
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/17>
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/18>
> <https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/21>
> 
> These issues were provoked by analysis of the use-cases, hence my 
> mistake, but the subject is the LDP Core. Blame my unfamiliarity 
> with the tool and the unclear semantics of 'Product'.
> I don't recall this (mis)assignment being in any way critical to 
> their acceptance as 'open' issues, so am I allowed procedurally to 
> change the product now?
> We plan to annotate the UC&R FPWD with any open issues relevant to 
> it, as is the Linked Data Platform FPWD. So this product assignment 
> is important.
> 
> If anyone has any technical or procedural objections please let me 
> know. I'll hold off from making any such change until after the call
> next Monday.
> 
> Note that the other three issues are properly issues against UC&R, 
> and will be considered as such.
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/30>
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40>
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/41>
> 
> Thanks, Steve.
> 
> 
> 
> Steve Battle
> 
> -- 
> Steve Battle
> Semantic Engineer
> 
> E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
> Web: www.sysemia.com
> 
> Sysemia Limited
> The Innovation Centre, Bristol&  Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent, 
> Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR
> Registered in England and Wales. Company Number: 7555456
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> 
> Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the 
> addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If 
> you receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If 
> you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of 
> distribution, copying or use of this communication or the 
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 
> Attachments to this e-mail may contain software viruses which may 
> damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken reasonable steps to 
> minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments are virus 
> checked before they are opened.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:43:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:44:26 UTC