Re: LDP Implementation Report for LDP4j

Hi Steve,

Here I've attached an updated version of the implementation report which
now includes the results for the Direct Container and Indirect Container
tests.

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nandana,
>
> This report [1] has been incorporated into the WG conformation report [2].
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/w3c/ldp-testsuite/blob/gh-pages/report/contrib/ldp4j/ldp-testsuite-execution-report-earl.ttl
> [2]:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#subj_7
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> http://stevespeicher.me
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
> nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've attached the implementation report for LDP4j [1] herewith. This
>> report covers the MUST, SHOULD, and MAY requirements of the LDP
>> specification for RDF Resources and Basic Containers. LDP4j passes all the
>> MUST requirements of RDF Sources and 35/37 MUST requirements of Basic
>> Containers.
>>
>> We currently don't support resources creation using PUT, PATCH method,
>> and Slug header. We will send an updated report which includes the results
>> for Direct Containers once the testing is completed on those.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Nandana
>>
>> [1] - http://www.ldp4j.org/
>>
>
>