Re: Comments on March 2014 of draft of LDP ( LC-2925 LC-2923 LC-2924)

 Dear Martin Nally ,

The Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Linked Data Platform 1.0
published on 11 Mar 2014. Thank you for having taken the time to review the
document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-ldp-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 14 May 2014.
In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution
for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus
cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal
objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition
of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group,
Eric Prud'hommeaux
Yves Lafon
W3C Staff Contacts

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/OF5E5BC1BA.436129F5-ON85257CBB.00786073-85257CBB.0078B137@us.ibm.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/


=====

Your comment on :
> it would be quite useful to have more examples. Developers will really
> heavily on them for comprehension, perhaps even more that the normative
> text.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2925):
Agreed.


----

Your comment on Membership triples:
> Definition of "membership triples" seems limiting in saying LDP-RS' 
> state must hold the membership triples.  In our implementation, the 
> membership triple is held in a graph assigned to the member resource.
> Suggestion is to adjust the definition to allow for this perhaps common
> 
> implementation case.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2923):
Agreed. The definition has been changed not to imply any particular way the
triples are stored.

----

Your comment on 5.1 Introduction This section is non-normative. Many HTTP
a...:
> Confusing examples (3-5) [2], there needs to be a bit more description 
> between these. It would be helpful to add some narrative between them,
> as well as showing POST example.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2924):
It is always difficult to find the right balance between providing enough
examples for people to understand the spec and not crowding the
specification with non-normative content. As it's become common practice
the WG is developing a Primer that is dedicated to educating people on the
spec. The editor's draft is at:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/tip/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html


----

Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 19:55:43 UTC