W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-comments@w3.org > June 2014

describedby / powder

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:58:50 +0100
Message-ID: <539FF53A.60805@w3.org>
To: public-ldp-comments@w3.org, team-ldp-chairs@w3.org
Dear all,

This is to confirm that the editors of the various POWDER 
Recommendations are happy for the LDP WG to repeat the definition of the 
describedby relationship. For completeness, the e-mail relevant e-mail 
thread is shown below.

Thank you for cleaning up after us!

Phil.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: describedby / powder
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:57:21 +0000
From: Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, Stasinos 
Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>

Same from me. Hope everyone is doing fine! :)

Cheers
Kevin


Sent from Samsung Mobile


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrea Perego
Date:16/06/2014 21:58 (GMT+00:00)
To: Stasinos Konstantopoulos
Cc: Sandro Hawke ,"Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group" ,Phil Archer
Subject: Re: describedby / powder


The same from my side.

Cheers,

Andrea

Il giorno 16/giu/2014 18:44, "Stasinos Konstantopoulos" 
<konstant@iit.demokritos.gr<mailto:konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>> ha scritto:
Phil, Sandro, all, I agree; there is no reason to object I can think of.

s


On 16 June 2014 17:44, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>> 
wrote:
> Stasine, Andrea, Kevin,
>
> As you know, I messed up in the POWDER spec when defining describedby - the
> most referred to thing we did. I sort of put right in 2010 [1] but not very
> satisfactorily. As a result, the Linked Data Platform WG, who want to use
> the relationship, are seeking a signal from us that we're happy for them to
> repeat the definition in their work. It remains unchanged and POWDER is
> credited so I see no reason to object to this but if you do, Sandro's e-mail
> shows you where to raise that.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/blog/2010/11/a-toucan-describedby-data/
>
>
> On 16/06/2014 15:22, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>
>> The text is here:
>>
>>
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#link-relation-describedby
>>
>>
>> Is there anyone else we can get to review this on behalf of POWDER and
>> confirm to public-ldp-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-ldp-comments@w3.org> that it's fine, for the benefit of
>> IETF?   In any case a comment from you would be helpful.
>>
>>       -- Sandro
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 07:59:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:44:38 UTC