- From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:45:01 +0100
- To: "John P. McCrae" <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: Penny Labropoulou <penny@ilsp.gr>, Marta Villegas <marta.villegas@gmail.com>, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>, public-ld4lt@w3.org
> LingHub: This is really lider-project.eu... I have had bad experience with the longevity of project URLs Yes I agree with John. Most likely the URI will eventually stop working, even if you use purl.org. In which case it's worst because you don't even control the DNS. A better option would be to adopt something like Trusty URIs: http://www.slideshare.net/TobiasKuhn/trustyuris Although more complicated. But it's an idea if we want to take URI management more seriously. Best, Luca On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I meant that I am not sure who owns the following > http://www.meta-net.eu/meta-share. Also I am not sure about it's stability > as it is a project URL again > > Regards, > John > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Penny Labropoulou <penny@ilsp.gr> wrote: >> >> Hi all! >> >> John, a question: what do you mean with "Metashare: We are unlikely to >> have access here."? >> >> >> >> For the namespace, I think it would be nice to have some prefix that says >> that these metadata come from the MetaShare model (as it is by now a >> recognizable model in the community). I honestly don't know whether this can >> still be done by hosting it at purl.org and/or whether we can use Marta's >> ttl and make the extensions/changes we discuss at ld4lt on that. >> >> If I remember well, purl.org also allows for resolvable URIs (if that's >> the correct term) for pointing at properties/classes etc. So, that's a good >> solution. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Penny >> >> >> >> From: johnmccrae@gmail.com [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John >> P. McCrae >> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:57 PM >> To: Marta Villegas >> Cc: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel; public-ld4lt@w3.org >> Subject: Re: [ld4lt] namespace for the model of language resources >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Marta, purl.org is best, although I would rather redirect to >> a service that does RDF properly (content negotiation etc., nice HTML >> version) >> >> Metashare: We are unlikely to have access here. >> >> LingHub: This is really lider-project.eu... I have had bad experience with >> the longevity of project URLs >> >> LD4LT: I don't know what this means... but ld4lt.org is for sale and >> buying it is an option >> >> W3C: Also a possibility, but then we may have to handle W3C procedures if >> we wish to update the model, i.e., this is probably better if we know the >> model is more or less 'static' >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Marta Villegas >> <marta.villegas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> from our experience: >> >> >> >> purl.org is nice as it gives you a persintent URI which you redirect >> whenever you want BUT we redirected to github (to allow for community >> edition, versioning etc). Github uses https and Protege has problems with >> https >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2015-01-22 10:02 GMT+01:00 Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>: >> >> El 21/01/2015 13:19, Jorge Gracia escribió: >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the >> following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose for >> the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?" >> >> >> >> The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at >> http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl An alternative namespace has to be >> found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in place. There >> are several alternatives: >> >> - Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata) >> >> - Linghub-based namespace >> >> - purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs) >> >> --> I think this is for the moment the most flexible, but not the best... >> >> - LD4LT-based namespace >> >> --> Who is responsible for this namespace? >> >> - W3C-based namespace >> >> - Other? >> >> >> >> All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send your >> opinion around or to add further alternatives. >> >> >> >> May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of tomorrow's >> telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think) >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jorge Gracia, PhD >> Ontology Engineering Group >> Artificial Intelligence Department >> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid >> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/ >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel >> >> D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) >> >> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial >> >> Facultad de Informática >> >> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid >> >> >> >> Campus de Montegancedo s/n >> >> Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain >> >> Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 >> >> Skype: vroddon3 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Marta Villegas >> marta.villegas@gmail.com >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 13:14:32 UTC