RE: [ld4lt] namespace for the model of language resources

Hi all!

John, a question: what do you mean with "Metashare: We are unlikely to have access here."? 

 

For the namespace, I think it would be nice to have some prefix that says that these metadata come from the MetaShare model (as it is by now a recognizable model in the community). I honestly don't know whether this can still be done by hosting it at purl.org and/or whether we can use Marta's ttl and make the extensions/changes we discuss at ld4lt on that. 

If I remember well, purl.org also allows for resolvable URIs (if that's the correct term) for pointing at properties/classes etc. So, that's a good solution.

 

Best,

Penny

 

From: johnmccrae@gmail.com [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John P. McCrae
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:57 PM
To: Marta Villegas
Cc: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel; public-ld4lt@w3.org
Subject: Re: [ld4lt] namespace for the model of language resources

 

Hi,

I agree with Marta, purl.org <http://purl.org>  is best, although I would rather redirect to a service that does RDF properly (content negotiation etc., nice HTML version)

Metashare: We are unlikely to have access here.

LingHub: This is really lider-project.eu... I have had bad experience with the longevity of project URLs

LD4LT: I don't know what this means... but ld4lt.org <http://ld4lt.org>  is for sale and buying it is an option

W3C: Also a possibility, but then we may have to handle W3C procedures if we wish to update the model, i.e., this is probably better if we know the model is more or less 'static'

Regards,
John

 

 

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Marta Villegas <marta.villegas@gmail.com <mailto:marta.villegas@gmail.com> > wrote:

from our experience:

 

purl.org <http://purl.org>  is nice as it gives you a persintent URI which you redirect whenever you want BUT we redirected to github (to allow for community edition, versioning etc). Github uses https and Protege has problems with https

 

 

 

2015-01-22 10:02 GMT+01:00 Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es <mailto:vrodriguez@fi.upm.es> >:

El 21/01/2015 13:19, Jorge Gracia escribió:

Dear all, 

 

During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose for the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?"

 

The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl  An alternative namespace has to be found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in place. There are several alternatives:

-  Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata)

-  Linghub-based namespace

-  purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs)

--> I think this is for the moment the most flexible, but not the best...



-  LD4LT-based namespace

--> Who is responsible for this namespace?



-  W3C-based namespace

- Other?

 

All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send your opinion around or to add further alternatives.

 

May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of tomorrow's telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think)


 

Best regards,

 

-- 

Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://jogracia.url.ph/web/






-- 
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
 
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091336%203672> 
Skype: vroddon3





 

-- 

Marta Villegas
marta.villegas@gmail.com <mailto:marta.villegas@gmail.com>