- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 06:27:43 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
Hi! > Great suggestion, but it’s still failing. The fact that it things its > using Specberus and not ReSpec is telling. I think Specberus is in general always running.. (see e.g., a successful WD publication of the Publishing WG [1]) When comparing their status report [2] to ours [3] I noticed that in our latest failed attempt "thisVersion" still contains a ; instead of &. "thisVersion": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD;shortName=json-ld11-json-ld11-20190509/", so I checked https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/ECHIDNA and saw that it still contains a ; instead of & ... I think you've only pushed your changes to the publication branch, but not the main branch where Specberus seems to fetch the ECHIDNA file from.. br simon [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2019Apr/0006.html [2] https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=fec173dd-c037-44ff-905d-b6d5d0d6b471 [3] https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=1504c6f3-3516-4e4d-a832-5de8a5dfd1f2 --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2019-05-09 07:58, schrieb Gregg Kellogg: > Great suggestion, but it’s still failing. The fact that it things its > using Specberus and not ReSpec is telling. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > >> On May 8, 2019, at 10:49 PM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> >> wrote: >> >> apparently yes.. they changed from ; to & on 5th of March (see >> https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna-with-ReSpec-and-GitHub/_history) >> >> >> br simon >> --- >> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal >> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >> >> www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys >> >> Am 2019-05-09 07:47, schrieb Gregg Kellogg: >>> Thanks for the suggestion, I’ll give it a shot. It worked on the last >>> release, but that could have been luck. >>> Gregg Kellogg >>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On May 8, 2019, at 10:44 PM, Simon Steyskal >>>> <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>>> # ECHIDNA configuration >>>>> index.html?specStatus=WD;shortName=json-ld11 respec >>>> idk if this changes anything but according to >>>> https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna-with-ReSpec-and-GitHub#actually-publishing >>>> this should be >>>> # ECHIDNA configuration >>>> index.html?specStatus=WD&shortName=json-ld11 respec >>>> i.e., s/;/&/ >>>> hth, simon >>>> --- >>>> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal >>>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >>>> www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys >>>> Am 2019-05-08 18:22, schrieb Gregg Kellogg: >>>>> There’s an issue with Echidna which is delaying the update of the >>>>> specs. >>>>> The failure was noted on the mailing list [1], and I filed a bug >>>>> report [2]. Unfortunately, no response as of yet. >>>>> As you can see, it seems to think this isn’t a WD and is running >>>>> Specberus rather than ReSpec; the ECHIDNA configuration is >>>>> unchanged >>>>> from the last publication. >>>>> Once this is resolved, I’ll attempt to publish API and Framing >>>>> specs too. >>>>> Gregg Kellogg >>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2019May/0002.html >>>>> [2] https://github.com/w3c/echidna/issues/669 >> <echidna.PNG>
Received on Friday, 10 May 2019 04:28:13 UTC