W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-json-ld-wg@w3.org > April 2019

Re: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@univ-lyon1.fr>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:09:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+OuRR-Axpd6bA=M8iZ_BiWxd0eML18ZE=xvE=Oa_YDDm1yARQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org>
Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
I had a look at this section in particular.

* "[The JSON-LD documentation] is difficult to understand from the point of
view of a JSON and XML user"

  ouch!

* "a class name (a.k.a. data type)"

  This bothers me for 2 reasons:
  - calling them "data types" may create confusion with literal datatypes;
  - what is being given a type is not the data,
    it is the *real-world object* described by the data.

  In both cases, I'm not entirely sure whether it requires fixing,
  or it is just purist nitpicking...

* "lists of lists are not allowed in JSON-LD"

  This is true of JSON-LD 1.0, but was fixed in JSON-LD 1.1.
  Should be suggest that they say "JSON-LD 1.0",  and possibly mention the
fix in "JSON-LD 1.1"?
  Or even possibly suggest that the move to JSON-LD 1.1, even if they
publish before us,
  just like VC and WoT are about to do?



On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:29, ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org> wrote:

> The JSON-LD-specific section of this rather large document seems to be at:
>
>
> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/blob/master/json-best-practice/clause_7-from_json_to_jsonld.adoc
>
> ajs6f
>
> > On Apr 10, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > I forwarded this request on before; it should be discussed on the next
> call.
> >
> > Gregg Kellogg
> > gregg@greggkellogg.net
> >
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >> From: Gobe Hobona <ghobona@opengeospatial.org>
> >> Subject: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice
> >> Date: March 7, 2019 at 12:14:38 AM PST
> >> To: gregg@greggkellogg.net
> >> Cc: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Joan Masó Pau <
> joan.maso@uab.cat>
> >>
> >> Dear Gregg,
> >>
> >> The Architecture Domain Working Group of the the Open Geospatial
> Consortium (OGC) has been working on a JSON Best Practice for the
> geospatial community. The document is still in draft form but we would
> appreciate it if you could please share the link with the W3C JSON-LD
> community group. Any feedback is welcome.
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/tree/master/json-best-practice
> >>
> >> I have copied in Joan Maso, the chair of the Architecture Domain
> Working Group and editor of the draft OGC JSON Best Practice.
> >>
> >> I have also copied in Linda van den Brink (Geonovum), the chair of the
> OGC-W3C Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group
> https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Gobe
> >>
> >> __________________________________________
> >>
> >> Dr. Gobe Hobona, PhD MRICS
> >> Director, Knowledge Management
> >> Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> >> OGC: Making location count.
> >>
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gobehobona
> >> Tel: +44 744 409 6781
> >> e-mail: ghobona@opengeospatial.org
> >> www.opengeospatial.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2019 09:10:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 April 2019 09:10:30 UTC