Re: [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2018-08-31

On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:18 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Gregg, thanks.
> 
> Some editorial comments
> 
> - Although not required formally, I think it would be a good idea to add some reference to the work of the CG and make it clear that this document has been derived from the CG documents. I have chased back the FPWD for the annotation model spec[1] which does have some words on that. 

Okay, a reference in SODT should do it.

> - It is a great idea to highlight, in green, the important changes v.a.v. JSON-LD 1.0. However, this should be accompanied by some intro making this fact clear, ie, some words about the notational conventions. Without that, it is not clear what those green highlights mean.

Lookin Typographical Conventions.

> A procedural issue, maybe I should have raised that earlier; my apologies for that. But our charter says:
> 
> "To afford asynchronous decisions and organizational deliberation, any resolution (including publication decisions) taken in a face-to-face meeting or teleconference will be considered provisional. A call for consensus (CfC) will be issued for all resolutions (for example, via email and/or web-based survey), with a response period from one week to 10 working days, depending on the chair's evaluation of the group consensus on the issue."
> 
> Although it is up to the chairs to see whether this is a contentious issue (I personally do not believe so), I would think that we have to keep to our own rules for something like this. Which means that, although I can certainly issue a provisional publication request next week, the decision should be considered as binding only in a week from now. This means that the next available slot for publication would be the 11th of September. (We should actually keep to that date; I leave for Japan on the 12th and will be away for around 10 days, mostly on vacations.)

Fair enough.

Gregg

> Ivan
> 
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2018/03/jsonld-wg-charter.html#decisions
> 
> 
> 
>>> On 31 Aug 2018, at 00:35, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Aug 30, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> Our next call is tomorrow, Friday August 31st at 12 noon Eastern, 9am Pacific, 5pm UK, 6pm Europe.
>>> 
>>> The details for the call are, as always:
>>>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-json-ld-wg/2018Jun/0000.html
>>> And please remember to join the IRC channel #json-ld
>>> 
>>> Agenda:
>>> 
>>> * Scribe Selection
>>> * Approve minutes of previous call: 
>>> * Announcements / Reminders
>>>   -- TPAC. Do you feel reminded yet?
>>>   -- Others
>>> * Introductions if needed
>>> 
>>> * Logistics:  FPWD
>>>   -- We need a call for consensus to publish the first public working drafts of the specifications.
>> 
>> RawGit versions of the proposed publications:
>> 
>> syntax: https://rawgit.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/fpwd/publication-snapshots/FPWD/Overview.html
>> api: https://rawgit.com/w3c/json-ld-api/fpwd/publication-snapshots/FPWD/Overview.html
>> framing: https://rawgit.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/fpwd/publication-snapshots/FPWD/Overview.html
>> 
>>> * Issues:
>>> -- https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/8
>>> PROPOSAL: Remove the "ordered lexicographically by key" from the algorithm and allow implementations to handle this as they see fit.  
>>> 
>>> -- https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/3
>>>    https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/6
>>> No concrete proposal yet.
>> 
>> Possible solution in a comment on #3: https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/3#issuecomment-416754165
>> 
>> Gregg
>> 
>>>  -- https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/4
>>>     Support JSON values that aren't mapped
>>> PROPOSAL: Define a @json keyword, initially mapped to jsonld:json, for use with @type to indicate the @value is a json literal value
>>> 
>>>  --  https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/15
>>> No concrete proposal yet.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> * AOB
>>> * Adjourn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Rob
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Rob Sanderson
>>> Semantic Architect
>>> The Getty Trust
>>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>