W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 09:46:16 +0200
Message-ID: <4FA4DAC8.5000203@gmx.de>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
On 2012-05-05 00:04, Larry Masinter wrote:
> I think it is in scope to fix the registration guidelines to clarify the registration process, in areas where registrants often make mistakes.
>
> This is one of them.
>
> == proposed add ==
> "In general, a URI or an IRI can be thought of as   consisting of
>      <scheme>:<scheme-specific-part>#<fragment>.
>
> However, the registration defines<scheme>  and the syntax and semantics of<fragment>   depends only on the media type of the representation accessed. New scheme definitions MUST NOT define syntax or semantics of fragment identifiers; that is, registration specifications should define the syntax of<scheme-specific-part>  and its meaning for each<scheme>  defined.
> ==end proposed add==

Sounds good to me.
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 07:46:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:44 UTC