- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 09:46:16 +0200
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
On 2012-05-05 00:04, Larry Masinter wrote: > I think it is in scope to fix the registration guidelines to clarify the registration process, in areas where registrants often make mistakes. > > This is one of them. > > == proposed add == > "In general, a URI or an IRI can be thought of as consisting of > <scheme>:<scheme-specific-part>#<fragment>. > > However, the registration defines<scheme> and the syntax and semantics of<fragment> depends only on the media type of the representation accessed. New scheme definitions MUST NOT define syntax or semantics of fragment identifiers; that is, registration specifications should define the syntax of<scheme-specific-part> and its meaning for each<scheme> defined. > ==end proposed add== Sounds good to me.
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 07:46:48 UTC