- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:33 +0200
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org, ted.ietf@gmail.com, evnikita2@gmail.com
* Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >Strictly speaking, UCS is not a character range (or, more precisely, a >character repertoire) but a coded characer set (and UCE-2/UCS-4 are >encoding forms). Therefore I suggest that the following is more accurate >and more consistent with RFC 6365: > > [RFC3987] introduced IRIs by expanding the character repertoire > allowed for URIs from ASCII to Unicode [UNICODE]; [RFC3987bis] > updates that definition to match the current usage of IRIs. I don't like starting a stence with a reference like that, rather spell out "RFC 3987 [RFC3987]" if you can't move things around, and I do not like "expanding the character repertoire allowed for" at all, the words do not go together like that. Could this just say this updates RFC 3987 to reflect current usage? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 22:01:04 UTC