- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:59:13 -0600
- To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, uri@w3.org
FYI, Philippe Le Hagaret has initiated discussion about the proposed web+ URI scheme prefix on the public-ietf-w3c list. I think that is the right place to discuss the topic, so if you have feedback then please subscribe to that list and post there. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/ mailto:public-ietf-w3c-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe Peter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: web+: enabling websites to expose services with custom URI schemes to registerProtocolHandler. Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:33:59 +0000 Resent-From: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:33:41 -0700 From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Organization: World Wide Web Consortium To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> CC: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org Following the morning discussion, here are the links to the web+ definition: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/system-state-and-capabilities.html#custom-handlers look for the item on scheme (registerProtocolHandler() only) http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/iana.html#web-scheme-prefix Note that the Working Group is about to decide that this section needs rewrite because it must not look like an IANA registration. I also suggest to look at the rational section of a change proposal related to this: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189#Rationale Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 17:59:41 UTC