- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:23:13 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, masinter@adobe.com, draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg@tools.ietf.org, public-iri@w3.org
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 2012-04-12 17:17 +0200: > I also note that Mike Smith just posted in HTML WG land: > > >I have had a discussion with the chairs of the IETF IRI WG regarding HTML > >WG issue 189. A related IETF IRI WG ticket had opened for this issue, but a > >determination was then made that the issue is out of scope for the IRI WG. > > > >Based on that, my recommendation is that the HTML WG should proceed on > >whatever the next steps are on this issue, without blocking on getting any > >further consideration of it from the IRI WG. > > (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Apr/0075.html>) > > That sounds a bit like what he heard is "the IRI WG does not care about > this", which I believe would be very unfortunate. That's not what I heard. What I heard is exactly what I wrote. The only comment posted to the issue was one that said it was out of scope, and the issue was closed as wontfix. As I understand it, that indicates the IRI WG is not planning to take any further action on it, and that's something the HTML WG should know. If the IRI WG decides to re-open the issue, then I can communicate that back to the HTML WG. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 15:23:24 UTC