Re: FIY: I-D Action:draft-duerst-eai-mailto-00.txt

On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:50:04 -0500, Michael A. Puls II  
<shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:39:11 -0500, Martin J. Dürst  
> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> I did not yet define the mailto scheme in terms of an IRI, but I may do
>> that in a future version.
>
> If you did, does that mean that instead of using:
>
> URI:
> <mailto:?subject=32%CE%BCF%20Choke>
>
> , one could use:
>
> IRI:
> <mailto:?subject=32μF%20Choke>
>
> ?
>

Not that it matter for the example, but the "F" should be an "H" to make  
sense.

-- 
Michael

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 02:54:57 UTC